By John M. Hart III, Esq.

This past weekend, I had the pleasure of attending the Harrisburg Auto Show, a spectacle of modern automotive innovation and a preview of what’s to come in the auto industry. Amidst the array of vehicles, the electric vehicles (EVs) stood out with their unique, eye-catching designs. 

Almost every major auto manufacturer showcased at least one electric model, with some dedicating their entire display to these futuristic vehicles. However, it was not just the electric powertrains that stood out, but the striking use of lighting on these EVs that sparked both awe and contemplation.

 A Festival of Lights: The New EV Aesthetic

 From exteriors glowing with sleek, illuminated lines to emblems and wheels lit up like a neon dream, the EVs at the Harrisburg Auto Show were a visual feast. Interiors resembled the set of a sci-fi movie, with screens replacing traditional dashboards and LED-lit ceilings, handles, and floors, making these vehicles more than just modes of transport; they were art in motion.

 While the minimal power draw of LEDs might not significantly impact the range, their extensive use raises questions. In a realm where power conservation is critical, why the emphasis on such elaborate electronics? Is this prioritizing style over substance, or a testament to advancements in EV technology?

 The Legal Perspective: Dazzling or Distracting?

 The array of external lights, while aesthetically pleasing, could pose significant distractions to other drivers. This brings forth a discussion on the balance between innovation and road safety. In many jurisdictions, vehicle lighting is strictly regulated to ensure that it does not impair the vision of other drivers or cause distractions.

 Liability Exposure and the Limited Tort Exception in PA

 This extensive use of lighting could potentially expose manufacturers to a significant chunk of liability, especially considering Pennsylvania’s auto insurance laws. In PA, drivers have the option to choose between limited tort and full tort coverage. Limited tort, the more economical option, restricts the right to seek compensation for pain and suffering unless the injuries meet certain exceptions. Full tort coverage, on the other hand, offers unrestricted rights to seek compensation for pain and suffering.

However, there are exceptions to the limited tort option, where a person can still seek compensation for pain and suffering. These exceptions include situations involving a drunk driver, a vehicle registered in another state, or if the injury is classified as serious, among others.

In the context of EVs with extensive lighting, if such a design element contributes to an accident, it could potentially meet an exception to the bar against pain and suffering under the limited tort option. This situation could open manufacturers to liabilities beyond typical vehicular accidents, especially if the lighting is deemed to have contributed to a serious injury or accident.

Illuminating the Road Ahead

The Harrisburg Auto Show was a display of the future of automotive design and technology. The prevalence and presentation of EVs highlighted the industry’s shift towards electric mobility and innovative design. However, the balance between innovation and responsibility is key. As we embrace this bright future, considering the legal and safety implications of these advancements is crucial, especially in the context of Pennsylvania’s unique auto insurance laws. Balancing innovation with a mindful approach to design and legal compliance will be essential in ensuring that the roads of tomorrow are as safe as they are spectacular.  

Either way, they are fascinating to look at and I’m sure once they hit the final development stages, they will have the kinks worked out.  I can assure you that I will remain updated and informed on the most recent articles involving any issues that may arise out of the aesthetics potentially causing a distraction on the road.